Comments on: Photo Geek Weekly Episode 179 – Generative Fill https://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-179-generative-fill/ Fri, 09 Jun 2023 06:52:08 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Don Komarechka https://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-179-generative-fill/#comment-2464 Fri, 09 Jun 2023 06:52:08 +0000 https://photogeekweekly.com/?post_type=podcast&p=734#comment-2464 In reply to Rex.

Rex, an interesting take, but just because something is on a negative doesn’t make it “real”. Copy stands allow one negative to be copied – but what if the “original” was a digital fabrication being transposed onto film?

Sadly, it’s incredibly easy to fake a negative. It would be as authentic as printing off a copy of an AI image and calling it real, simply because it was tangible.

]]> By: Rex https://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-179-generative-fill/#comment-2454 Wed, 07 Jun 2023 19:17:01 +0000 https://photogeekweekly.com/?post_type=podcast&p=734#comment-2454 Regarding AI and dealing with photo fakery, here’s a thought: for crucial photos that must be identifiably “true”, shoot analogue on film. An actual film negative is even better proof of the photo’s origins than a raw file.

Can you fake a negative? You probably can, but it would be way harder than throwing AI at a photo, so leas likely to happen, I would argue.

]]>