Comments on: Photo Geek Weekly Episode 124 – Cinemascape http://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-124-cinemascape/ Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:41:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.8.3 By: Robert http://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-124-cinemascape/#comment-1885 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 15:41:49 +0000 http://photogeekweekly.com/?post_type=podcast&p=516#comment-1885 In reply to Don Komarechka.

The XC10 & 15 have the same bump and a similar overall design. Maybe a review of those cameras will bring some enlightenment as to the purpose of the bump.

]]> By: Don Komarechka http://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-124-cinemascape/#comment-1884 Tue, 06 Oct 2020 00:32:55 +0000 http://photogeekweekly.com/?post_type=podcast&p=516#comment-1884 In reply to Robert.

I’m not questioning whether it will work well, I am questioning the design process. So many things about that camera feel rushed, which doesn’t bode well for long term complications on usability. I can very easily be wrong! But a viewfinder bump with no viewfinder just feels… wrong.

]]> By: Robert http://photogeekweekly.com/podcast/photo-geek-weekly-episode-124-cinemascape/#comment-1883 Mon, 05 Oct 2020 22:05:50 +0000 http://photogeekweekly.com/?post_type=podcast&p=516#comment-1883 Is it not uncommon to see video cameras stuffed into Frankenstein rigs? I think canon built something that would work well.

]]>